This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
I think so. Heavy-handed that is. The whole paragraph sounds like a laundry list of accusations made by people who simply don't like Tan because she doesn't always portray Chinese culture or Chinese men in a flattering light. Sorry but they need to get over that. After all, if they don't like the way she writes they can always try writing their own books. Tell us how "it really is". Sweetness and light no doubt. LOL. Tan is the only American author I know of who has even attempted to write about the Chinese experience here in the States. Her work is seminal in that respect alone. The paragraph needs to be rewritten or taken out altogether. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.90.39 (talk) 08:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Chisme (talk·contribs) that this section is heavy-handed, unbalanced, and not encyclopedic in tone. I have changed it to "Critical Reception" and added content to reflect the reality, that reception to Tan's books is overwhelming positive from literary critics and the public alike. Edits thus far are: 1) Added content related to positive reviews, awards, and 2) summarized the 'critical' section, which feels far too heavy for an encyclopedic article. If you or anyone else can help fill out Amy's positive contributions to literature and society, please feel free to expand this work. She is a jewel of a human being and writer, and this article should reflect that. --Pmlydon (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]