This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lyndon B. Johnson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Lyndon B. Johnson was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
The fact that Johnson had openly confirmed in September 1967 he did not want to run for a second full term must be mentioned in the article. ParsleySt1 (talk) 17:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article makes it sound as though he dropped out because of the poor result, when in reality he had announced six months earlier he might not stand again. In any case he later admitted he could not run for another term as he knew he would not survive it. (ParsleySt1 (talk) 16:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I would like to add 2 very good period photos of Lyndon B. Johnson: June 21 1960, Washington DC, Lyndon B. Johnson and Sen. J. William Fulbright. Lyndon B. Johnson, June 19 1960, Omaha NE. Both photos are not copyright protected. Shai Bandmann 1 (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty certain that Lyndon B. Johnson's penis, which he nicknamed "Jumbo", was a prominent part of his character and defined him to a greater degree than most other U.S. presidents. Here are sources:
I am leery of encouraging people to follow your links, as the second one loaded a lot of advertising onto my machine and it crashed. The Times article is behind a paywall. I didn't follow the others. What I saw is a rehash of what I have seen before. If you're really serious, there have been several discussions on the issue and the consensus was to not add any particular mention. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason I've been mentioning Roe v. Wade in the section about the passing is that most Americans remember the day of LBJ's passing as the day of the landmark ruling of Roe v. Wade by SCOTUS. I still want to continue to discussion in having it included here. The articles about the Reagan inauguration had the release of the hostages in Iran.
You've been pushing this angle for 18 months, attempting to paint LBJ's death as the larger and more important event. You are trying to throw a non-neutral twist on the history. Thankfully, Wikipedia is based on the the way that the media balances their coverage of the two events, rather than on the whims of individual Wikipedia users. If you keep pushing this angle you will be moving into the tendentious editing arena, which is a blockable offense. Binksternet (talk) 05:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The release of the hostages being on the very day of Reagan's inauguration was most probably due to more than happenstance. It is almost certain that LBJ's death coinciding with Roe being handed down was no more than that – coincidence. Dhtwiki (talk) 00:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When describing Johnson's previous occupations "a congressional aide" is mentioned. I personally think this should link towards the Wikipage about the congressional staff. (This is not very necessary.) RenoGamingTheResearch (talk) 22:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg)
Not done please provide links to these images, including their origin and copyright status - Arjayay (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)