Talk:Direct democracy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Direct democracy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Direct democracy:
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Boy, is this poorly written.
[edit]Poorly written. 84.229.133.113 (talk) 12:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- You are welcome to seriously improve it! -- ZH8000 (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- It is poorly written. For instance, the author waves general nouns such as, say, Anarchists, as if everyone knows what they mean exactly, and even more malicious, as if all anarchists believe one and the same thing uniformly, as if they were all robots. To make things even worse,the author then lists several of those general nouns, all of them extremely left oriented, or even with terrorist tendencies, that support direct democracy. As if only radicals support direct democracy. It's pure propaganda, the author of those passages does not bother to explain anything in any detail, nor to provide a counterexample: they just keep pushing in their own malicious direction. Also, the use of general nouns is hurtful, since it's political new-talk and does not provide any information at all, because general nouns do not refer to anything specific and real. That's why they're general. Such as, again, say, anarchists. If the author mentions anarchism as a philosophical concept with very well known literary representatives, why don't they say so then? Even then putting everything into a subject of few select anarchist books is extremely malicious. Improve it? Yes, delete those general propaganda, there's no other way to improve it. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.136.196.250 (talk) 11:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- That's the least of the problem. It is a lie too, but if we change it the anarchists will just change it back and Wiki likes tha. 2600:4040:7EDC:6400:1593:A59A:2D24:14DF (talk) 18:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Rojava
[edit]Hello. I find it difficult to understand the presence of the "Rojava" section in this article, because I do not see the link with the general theme of direct democracy. Kimdome (talk) 11:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Sortition?
[edit]"Fishkin instead argues that random sampling should be used to select a small, but still representative, number of people from the general public.[9][37]"
Is the above referring to [sortition] or something similar? Should a link or discussion of sortition be added here? Phytographer (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, a link to sortition should be added. HudecEmil (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah yeah 171.76.87.217 (talk) 14:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sussy Bakka 171.76.87.217 (talk) 14:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Essence of direct democracy
[edit]The essence of this topic is as follows
To let the people determine their laws. 196.188.35.22 (talk) 17:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
"True Democracy" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect True Democracy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14 § True Democracy until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 10:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: HIST 103 - Ancient and Modern Democracy
[edit]This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 14 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anonymous151515, Augustdancer, Tiramisulover07, Sg1129, ThatGuyLotus, HistoryMystery287 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Hemerodromos (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: English 111 First-Semester College Composition
[edit]This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2024 and 14 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): POUSHOO (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by POUSHOO (talk) 17:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Switzerland articles
- High-importance Switzerland articles
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages
- C-Class European Microstates articles
- Low-importance European Microstates articles
- C-Class Liechtenstein articles
- High-importance Liechtenstein articles
- Liechtenstein articles
- WikiProject European Microstates articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists