Talk:Elections in Canada

Canada: Governments / Politics High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Last Referendum

The last referendum was the one about elections reform and was in 2006, IIRC. Someone may want to update.

Two Party System

The part of Canada having a two party system is untrue. This is the United States. Canada has the Liberal Party, The Conservative Party, The NDP, and the Bloc Quebcios, ranging from 19 seats to 132 seats.

If you follow the link to two-party system, you'll see that that article defines the term to mean "two parties have a realistic chance of winning an election". I'm not sure that I agree with this completely, but the Elections in Canada clarifies in the same sentencethat Canada has "two dominant parties", which is true over the past 138 years, with only a few exceptions. Kevintoronto 23:50, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Multiple edits by 69.197.178.95 on Nov. 13, 2005

Please check the multiple edits Nov. 13, 2005 to the many Canadian federal election pages by 69.197.178.95, a first time editor. The edits seem to consist in many cases of subtle changes to the numbers without attribution. It could be vandalism. Hu 05:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I'm 69.197.178.95. I made these changes because the Canadian electoral ridings site linked on almost all of these election pages beneath the results tables shows different results.

"Prior to the =apotion= of the minimum of 36 days in law". This needs correcting, but I'm blocked because of my I.P. address. [Thank you]

I really can't follow this at all. FYI, this link gives the lengths of all campaigns. - Jord 20:28, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Brunswick

I've added a note below the Provincial elections table to reflect that a Progressive Conservative has left the party and now sits as an independent. I did this rather than change the table, because the table shows "election results" not "current state of parties". However, do people think we should go with the latter? Tompw 14:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your change because there are all kinds of other changes. In NB a former Liberal also sits as an independent and the NDP member has resigned and the seat been won in a by-election, in Yukon the Liberals have gained a seat in a by-election and on Yukon member sits as an independent, in Ontario the NDP has won a Liberal seat in a by-election and 3 seats are vacant, in NS a Liberal has crossed to the Conservatives and there is a vacancy. Those are some of the changes I can think of off of the top of my head. The article is on elections, not legislatures, so we are interested in election results and the table ought not change for any province until there is a general election. - Jord 14:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I've added a note stating that the table shows results rather than the current situation. Tompw 10:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent legislation warrants significant change to this article

Bill C-16 in the Canadian Parliament established fixed election dates of the third Monday in October every four years beginning October 19, 2009. The bill received Royal Assent on May 3, 2007. A minority government may still fall precipitating a premature election should there be a successful non-confidence motion. Reference: http://www.parl.gc.ca/LEGISINFO/index.asp?List=ls&Query=4544&Session=14&Language=e

64.56.130.94 13:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Can-pol w.jpg

Image:Can-pol w.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can the Governor-General vote?

The article says:

Every person who is Canadian citizen 18 years of age or older is allowed to vote except for the Chief Electoral Officer and the Deputy Chief Electoral Officer.

In Australia by convention (I think) the Governor-General can't vote in federal elections, and the Governors can't vote in state elections. This is of course because the Governor-General and Governors are meant to be outside of politics. Is there a similar limitation on the Canadian Governor-General and Lieutenant-Governors? —Felix the Cassowary 11:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

s4 of Charter

The article seems to be saying that the war and insurrection element of s4 of the Charter was added to permit PM Borden to delay calling an election during WWI. I'd really like to see a source on that. WWI: 1914-1918. S4 of Charter: 1984-present. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.58.36.244 (talk) 05:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By-election clarification

The article says, "It is at the discretion of the Prime Minister to call by-elections, but they must be called between the 11th and 180th day after the chief electoral officer receives notice of the vacancy." Either this is poorly stated or is unexpected enough that it needs a follow-up sentence. Does this mean the PM has the discretion to call the election at any time between 11 and 180 days or that he or she can simply not call the by-election by waiting 180 days. -Rrius (talk) 22:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about the 11/180 thing. But, I believe the PM can't call by-elections. The Governor General calls by-elections, following the PM's recommendations (which the GG can refuse). GoodDay (talk) 00:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voting Age

This article says "Every person who is Canadian citizen 18 years of age or older is allowed to vote..."

But Section Three of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms reads

"3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of the members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein."

Citizenship Act ( R.S., 1985, c. C-29 ) Part 1

"3. (1) Subject to this Act, a person is a citizen if

(a) the person was born in Canada after February 14, 1977;"

It seems to me the Charter gives any Canadian Citizen the right to vote not just those 18 or older. Even if this is not what is practiced —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldpringle (talk • contribs) 01:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Latest national elections

An editor has added this section with the results of the 2006 federal election, which is clearly not the latest national election. I will replace it with a link to the latest federal election so as not to mislead readers. Ground Zero | t 20:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elections in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160110221331/http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html to http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Federal Election

This section seems to emphasize electoral reform. Should that be part of the election or in a section of its own? Sarboss (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"most likely"?

"The leader of the party most likely to hold the confidence of the House of Commons becomes the prime minister." This sentence is confusing to me. How is "most likely" determined? 50.48.145.164 (talk) 14:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]