This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Return of the Jedi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Return of the Jedi was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 20th Century Studios, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 20th Century Studios and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.20th Century StudiosWikipedia:WikiProject 20th Century StudiosTemplate:WikiProject 20th Century Studios20th Century Studios
I tried adding with a source that clarifies the critical response for the Prequels was more mixed amongst fans as it tended to be the older generation of fans and critics that were more polarized but the younger generation even as kids tended to be more positive of them but it got edited out. I think it's necessary to tell this side of the story as it's part of history. As while "polarized" tells a part of the story it seems more leaning to what the older generation of fans thought. Joe12Hawk (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On the Phantom Menace page, Maul’s survival in TCW is mentioned. Someone said that doing the same for Boba wouldn’t work because it’s not relevant to the film itself. While this is fair, it’s also inconsistent with the Phantom Menace page.
For consistency’s sake, I think either the mention of Boba surviving should be added, or the mention of Maul surviving should be removed from that page, since both deaths were retconned via TV shows.
This is the talk page for Return of the Jedi, what happens on another article is not relevant here. Something that was retconned in a TV show nearly 40 years after this isn't relevant to the plot of this movie. Film plots are contemporary to the film and its release. If you wish to remove it from TPM then go ahead. Canterbury Tailtalk00:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed two links that did not offer anything "extra" that was not available. The list has grown too long. The Wookieepedia link needs be checked. The site has a warning "I have a bad feeling about this", and a plea "help Wookieepedia by editing this article". Readers do not need to be directed off-site to a user edited Wikipedia knockoff that has issues. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
